Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity. / Marschark, Marc; Zettler, Ingo; Dammeyer, Jesper.

I: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Bind 22, Nr. 3, 01.07.2017, s. 269-277.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Marschark, M, Zettler, I & Dammeyer, J 2017, 'Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity', Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, bind 22, nr. 3, s. 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx018

APA

Marschark, M., Zettler, I., & Dammeyer, J. (2017). Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(3), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx018

Vancouver

Marschark M, Zettler I, Dammeyer J. Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2017 jul. 1;22(3):269-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx018

Author

Marschark, Marc ; Zettler, Ingo ; Dammeyer, Jesper. / Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity. I: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2017 ; Bind 22, Nr. 3. s. 269-277.

Bibtex

@article{7599460c263d41cfbb6bf7c97276e928,
title = "Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity",
abstract = "The notion of the Deaf community as a linguistic-cultural minority has been increasingly recognized and studied over the last two decades. However, significant differences of opinion and perspective within that population typically have been neglected in the literature. Social dominance orientation (SDO), a theoretical construct, typically focusing on intergroup perceptions and relations, is one aspect that has been left unexplored and might prove particularly enlightening. The present study investigated SDO among 119 deaf and 49 hearing young adults through a standardized SDO questionnaire. SDO was examined with regard to cultural identities (deaf, hearing, bicultural, and marginal), cochlear implant use, and language orientation (sign language or spoken language). The deaf participants were found to be more egalitarian than hearing individuals overall. Deaf individuals who held the strongest deaf identities, those who were sign language oriented, and not cochlear implant users, were the most egalitarian.",
author = "Marc Marschark and Ingo Zettler and Jesper Dammeyer",
year = "2017",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/deafed/enx018",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "269--277",
journal = "Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education",
issn = "1081-4159",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity

AU - Marschark, Marc

AU - Zettler, Ingo

AU - Dammeyer, Jesper

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - The notion of the Deaf community as a linguistic-cultural minority has been increasingly recognized and studied over the last two decades. However, significant differences of opinion and perspective within that population typically have been neglected in the literature. Social dominance orientation (SDO), a theoretical construct, typically focusing on intergroup perceptions and relations, is one aspect that has been left unexplored and might prove particularly enlightening. The present study investigated SDO among 119 deaf and 49 hearing young adults through a standardized SDO questionnaire. SDO was examined with regard to cultural identities (deaf, hearing, bicultural, and marginal), cochlear implant use, and language orientation (sign language or spoken language). The deaf participants were found to be more egalitarian than hearing individuals overall. Deaf individuals who held the strongest deaf identities, those who were sign language oriented, and not cochlear implant users, were the most egalitarian.

AB - The notion of the Deaf community as a linguistic-cultural minority has been increasingly recognized and studied over the last two decades. However, significant differences of opinion and perspective within that population typically have been neglected in the literature. Social dominance orientation (SDO), a theoretical construct, typically focusing on intergroup perceptions and relations, is one aspect that has been left unexplored and might prove particularly enlightening. The present study investigated SDO among 119 deaf and 49 hearing young adults through a standardized SDO questionnaire. SDO was examined with regard to cultural identities (deaf, hearing, bicultural, and marginal), cochlear implant use, and language orientation (sign language or spoken language). The deaf participants were found to be more egalitarian than hearing individuals overall. Deaf individuals who held the strongest deaf identities, those who were sign language oriented, and not cochlear implant users, were the most egalitarian.

U2 - 10.1093/deafed/enx018

DO - 10.1093/deafed/enx018

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28575425

AN - SCOPUS:85021758820

VL - 22

SP - 269

EP - 277

JO - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

JF - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

SN - 1081-4159

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 217653199