Honest People Tend to Use Less - Not More - Profanity: Comment on Feldman et al.'s (2017) Study 1
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Honest People Tend to Use Less - Not More - Profanity : Comment on Feldman et al.'s (2017) Study 1. / de Vries, Reinout E.; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo; Dunlop, Patrick D.; Holtrop, Djurre; Lee, Kibeom; Ashton, Michael C.
I: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Bind 9, Nr. 5, 07.2018, s. 516-520.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Honest People Tend to Use Less - Not More - Profanity
T2 - Comment on Feldman et al.'s (2017) Study 1
AU - de Vries, Reinout E.
AU - Hilbig, Benjamin E.
AU - Zettler, Ingo
AU - Dunlop, Patrick D.
AU - Holtrop, Djurre
AU - Lee, Kibeom
AU - Ashton, Michael C.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - This article shows that the conclusion of Feldman et al.’s (2017) Study 1 that profane individuals tend to be honest is most likely incorrect. We argue that Feldman et al.’s conclusion is based on a commonly held but erroneous assumption that higher scores on Impression Management Scales, such as the Lie Scale, are associated with trait dishonesty. Based on evidence from studies that have investigated (1) self-other agreement on Impression Management Scales, (2) the relation of Impression Management Scales with personality variables, and (3) the relation of Impression Management Scales with objective measures of cheating, we show that high scores on Impression Management Scales are associated with high—instead of low—trait honesty when measured in low-stakes conditions. Furthermore, using two data sets that included an “I never swear” item, we show that profanity use is negatively related to other reports of HEXACO honesty-humility and positively related to actual cheating.
AB - This article shows that the conclusion of Feldman et al.’s (2017) Study 1 that profane individuals tend to be honest is most likely incorrect. We argue that Feldman et al.’s conclusion is based on a commonly held but erroneous assumption that higher scores on Impression Management Scales, such as the Lie Scale, are associated with trait dishonesty. Based on evidence from studies that have investigated (1) self-other agreement on Impression Management Scales, (2) the relation of Impression Management Scales with personality variables, and (3) the relation of Impression Management Scales with objective measures of cheating, we show that high scores on Impression Management Scales are associated with high—instead of low—trait honesty when measured in low-stakes conditions. Furthermore, using two data sets that included an “I never swear” item, we show that profanity use is negatively related to other reports of HEXACO honesty-humility and positively related to actual cheating.
KW - personality
KW - honesty
KW - impression management
KW - Lie Scale
KW - profanity
U2 - 10.1177/1948550617714586
DO - 10.1177/1948550617714586
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30220959
VL - 9
SP - 516
EP - 520
JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science
JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science
SN - 1948-5506
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 210065607