Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? / Nielsen, Karina; Randall, Raymond; Holten, Ann-Louise; González, Eusebio Rial.

I: Work & Stress, Bind 24, Nr. 3, 2010, s. 234-259.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, K, Randall, R, Holten, A-L & González, ER 2010, 'Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?', Work & Stress, bind 24, nr. 3, s. 234-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393

APA

Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Holten, A-L., & González, E. R. (2010). Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress, 24(3), 234-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393

Vancouver

Nielsen K, Randall R, Holten A-L, González ER. Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works? Work & Stress. 2010;24(3):234-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393

Author

Nielsen, Karina ; Randall, Raymond ; Holten, Ann-Louise ; González, Eusebio Rial. / Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?. I: Work & Stress. 2010 ; Bind 24, Nr. 3. s. 234-259.

Bibtex

@article{d8b439b570714a74bd5b9325f1e4d0d3,
title = "Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?",
abstract = "In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in how organizational-level occupational health interventions aimed at improving psychosocial working conditions and employee health and well-being may be planned, implemented and evaluated. It has been claimed that such interventions have the best chance of achieving a significant impact if they follow an intervention process that is structured and also includes the participation of employees. This paper provides an overview of prominent European methods that describe systematic approaches to improving employee health and well-being through the alteration of the way in which work is designed, organized and managed. The methods identified are the Risk Management approach and the Management Standards from Great Britain, the German Health Circles approach, Work Positive from Ireland and Prevenlab from Spain. Comparative analyses reveal that these methods all consist of a five-phase process and that they share a number of core elements within these phases. However, overall the five methods have not beenthoroughly validated. To examine the validity of the core elements, we review them in the lightof current research in order to support their appropriateness in conducting organizationalleveloccupational health interventions. Finally, we discuss where we still need more research todetermine the working ingredients of organizational-level occupational health interventions.",
author = "Karina Nielsen and Raymond Randall and Ann-Louise Holten and Gonz{\'a}lez, {Eusebio Rial}",
year = "2010",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "234--259",
journal = "Work and Stress",
issn = "0267-8373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conducting Organizational-level occupational health interventions: What works?

AU - Nielsen, Karina

AU - Randall, Raymond

AU - Holten, Ann-Louise

AU - González, Eusebio Rial

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in how organizational-level occupational health interventions aimed at improving psychosocial working conditions and employee health and well-being may be planned, implemented and evaluated. It has been claimed that such interventions have the best chance of achieving a significant impact if they follow an intervention process that is structured and also includes the participation of employees. This paper provides an overview of prominent European methods that describe systematic approaches to improving employee health and well-being through the alteration of the way in which work is designed, organized and managed. The methods identified are the Risk Management approach and the Management Standards from Great Britain, the German Health Circles approach, Work Positive from Ireland and Prevenlab from Spain. Comparative analyses reveal that these methods all consist of a five-phase process and that they share a number of core elements within these phases. However, overall the five methods have not beenthoroughly validated. To examine the validity of the core elements, we review them in the lightof current research in order to support their appropriateness in conducting organizationalleveloccupational health interventions. Finally, we discuss where we still need more research todetermine the working ingredients of organizational-level occupational health interventions.

AB - In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in how organizational-level occupational health interventions aimed at improving psychosocial working conditions and employee health and well-being may be planned, implemented and evaluated. It has been claimed that such interventions have the best chance of achieving a significant impact if they follow an intervention process that is structured and also includes the participation of employees. This paper provides an overview of prominent European methods that describe systematic approaches to improving employee health and well-being through the alteration of the way in which work is designed, organized and managed. The methods identified are the Risk Management approach and the Management Standards from Great Britain, the German Health Circles approach, Work Positive from Ireland and Prevenlab from Spain. Comparative analyses reveal that these methods all consist of a five-phase process and that they share a number of core elements within these phases. However, overall the five methods have not beenthoroughly validated. To examine the validity of the core elements, we review them in the lightof current research in order to support their appropriateness in conducting organizationalleveloccupational health interventions. Finally, we discuss where we still need more research todetermine the working ingredients of organizational-level occupational health interventions.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.515393

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 234

EP - 259

JO - Work and Stress

JF - Work and Stress

SN - 0267-8373

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 117781782