Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument. / Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose; Momsen, Anne Mette Hedeager; Lund, Thomas; Grønborg, Therese Koops; Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah; Jensen, Chris; Skakon, Janne; Labriola, Merete.

I: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Bind 29, Nr. 2, 2019, s. 325–335.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Stapelfeldt, CM, Momsen, AMH, Lund, T, Grønborg, TK, Hogg-Johnson, S, Jensen, C, Skakon, J & Labriola, M 2019, 'Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument', Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, bind 29, nr. 2, s. 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

APA

Stapelfeldt, C. M., Momsen, A. M. H., Lund, T., Grønborg, T. K., Hogg-Johnson, S., Jensen, C., Skakon, J., & Labriola, M. (2019). Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 29(2), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

Vancouver

Stapelfeldt CM, Momsen AMH, Lund T, Grønborg TK, Hogg-Johnson S, Jensen C o.a. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2019;29(2):325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

Author

Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose ; Momsen, Anne Mette Hedeager ; Lund, Thomas ; Grønborg, Therese Koops ; Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah ; Jensen, Chris ; Skakon, Janne ; Labriola, Merete. / Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument. I: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2019 ; Bind 29, Nr. 2. s. 325–335.

Bibtex

@article{b6e79c13ba4845eeaf9e83ab4076097c,
title = "Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument",
abstract = "The objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Canadian Readiness for Return To Work instrument (RRTW-CA) into a Danish version (RRTWDK) by testing its test–retest and internal consistency reliability and its structural and construct validity. Cross-cultural adaptation of the six-staged RRTW-CA instrument was performed in a standardised, systematic five-step-procedure; forward translation, panel synthesis of the translation, back translation, consolidation and revision by researchers, and finally pre-testing. This RRTW-DK beta-version was tested for its psychometric properties by intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (n = 114), Cronbach{\textquoteright}s alpha (n = 471), confirmatory factor analyses (n = 373), and Spearman{\textquoteright}s rank correlation coefficient (n = 436) in sickness beneficiaries from a municipal employment agency and hospital wards. The original RRTW-CA stage structure could not be confirmed in the RRTWDK. The psychometric properties were thus inconclusive. The RRTW-DK cannot be recommended for use in the current version as the RRTW construct is questionable. The RRTW construct needs further exploration, preferably in a population that is homogeneous with regard to cause of sickness, disability duration and age.",
keywords = "Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of results, Sick leave, Surveys and questionnaires, Validation studies, Vocational",
author = "Stapelfeldt, {Christina Malmose} and Momsen, {Anne Mette Hedeager} and Thomas Lund and Gr{\o}nborg, {Therese Koops} and Sheilah Hogg-Johnson and Chris Jensen and Janne Skakon and Merete Labriola",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "325–335",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument

AU - Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose

AU - Momsen, Anne Mette Hedeager

AU - Lund, Thomas

AU - Grønborg, Therese Koops

AU - Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah

AU - Jensen, Chris

AU - Skakon, Janne

AU - Labriola, Merete

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Canadian Readiness for Return To Work instrument (RRTW-CA) into a Danish version (RRTWDK) by testing its test–retest and internal consistency reliability and its structural and construct validity. Cross-cultural adaptation of the six-staged RRTW-CA instrument was performed in a standardised, systematic five-step-procedure; forward translation, panel synthesis of the translation, back translation, consolidation and revision by researchers, and finally pre-testing. This RRTW-DK beta-version was tested for its psychometric properties by intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (n = 114), Cronbach’s alpha (n = 471), confirmatory factor analyses (n = 373), and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (n = 436) in sickness beneficiaries from a municipal employment agency and hospital wards. The original RRTW-CA stage structure could not be confirmed in the RRTWDK. The psychometric properties were thus inconclusive. The RRTW-DK cannot be recommended for use in the current version as the RRTW construct is questionable. The RRTW construct needs further exploration, preferably in a population that is homogeneous with regard to cause of sickness, disability duration and age.

AB - The objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Canadian Readiness for Return To Work instrument (RRTW-CA) into a Danish version (RRTWDK) by testing its test–retest and internal consistency reliability and its structural and construct validity. Cross-cultural adaptation of the six-staged RRTW-CA instrument was performed in a standardised, systematic five-step-procedure; forward translation, panel synthesis of the translation, back translation, consolidation and revision by researchers, and finally pre-testing. This RRTW-DK beta-version was tested for its psychometric properties by intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (n = 114), Cronbach’s alpha (n = 471), confirmatory factor analyses (n = 373), and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (n = 436) in sickness beneficiaries from a municipal employment agency and hospital wards. The original RRTW-CA stage structure could not be confirmed in the RRTWDK. The psychometric properties were thus inconclusive. The RRTW-DK cannot be recommended for use in the current version as the RRTW construct is questionable. The RRTW construct needs further exploration, preferably in a population that is homogeneous with regard to cause of sickness, disability duration and age.

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Sick leave

KW - Surveys and questionnaires

KW - Validation studies

KW - Vocational

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

DO - 10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29876726

AN - SCOPUS:85048038531

VL - 29

SP - 325

EP - 335

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 202941152