Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions : Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication. / Rabinovich, Anna; Morton, Thomas A.

I: Risk Analysis, Bind 32, Nr. 6, 01.06.2012, s. 992-1002.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Rabinovich, A & Morton, TA 2012, 'Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication', Risk Analysis, bind 32, nr. 6, s. 992-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x

APA

Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2012). Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 992-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x

Vancouver

Rabinovich A, Morton TA. Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication. Risk Analysis. 2012 jun. 1;32(6):992-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x

Author

Rabinovich, Anna ; Morton, Thomas A. / Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions : Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication. I: Risk Analysis. 2012 ; Bind 32, Nr. 6. s. 992-1002.

Bibtex

@article{d53537eb38ad4a63ae869f847a35b077,
title = "Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication",
abstract = "In two experimental studies we investigated the effect of beliefs about the nature and purpose of science (classical vs. Kuhnian models of science) on responses to uncertainty in scientific messages about climate change risk. The results revealed a significant interaction between both measured (Study 1) and manipulated (Study 2) beliefs about science and the level of communicated uncertainty on willingness to act in line with the message. Specifically, messages that communicated high uncertainty were more persuasive for participants who shared an understanding of science as debate than for those who believed that science is a search for absolute truth. In addition, participants who had a concept of science as debate were more motivated by higher (rather than lower) uncertainty in climate change messages. The results suggest that achieving alignment between the general public's beliefs about science and the style of the scientific messages is crucial for successful risk communication in science. Accordingly, rather than uncertainty always undermining the effectiveness of science communication, uncertainty can enhance message effects when it fits the audience's understanding of what science is.",
keywords = "Climate science communication, Model of science, Uncertainty",
author = "Anna Rabinovich and Morton, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "992--1002",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions

T2 - Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication

AU - Rabinovich, Anna

AU - Morton, Thomas A.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - In two experimental studies we investigated the effect of beliefs about the nature and purpose of science (classical vs. Kuhnian models of science) on responses to uncertainty in scientific messages about climate change risk. The results revealed a significant interaction between both measured (Study 1) and manipulated (Study 2) beliefs about science and the level of communicated uncertainty on willingness to act in line with the message. Specifically, messages that communicated high uncertainty were more persuasive for participants who shared an understanding of science as debate than for those who believed that science is a search for absolute truth. In addition, participants who had a concept of science as debate were more motivated by higher (rather than lower) uncertainty in climate change messages. The results suggest that achieving alignment between the general public's beliefs about science and the style of the scientific messages is crucial for successful risk communication in science. Accordingly, rather than uncertainty always undermining the effectiveness of science communication, uncertainty can enhance message effects when it fits the audience's understanding of what science is.

AB - In two experimental studies we investigated the effect of beliefs about the nature and purpose of science (classical vs. Kuhnian models of science) on responses to uncertainty in scientific messages about climate change risk. The results revealed a significant interaction between both measured (Study 1) and manipulated (Study 2) beliefs about science and the level of communicated uncertainty on willingness to act in line with the message. Specifically, messages that communicated high uncertainty were more persuasive for participants who shared an understanding of science as debate than for those who believed that science is a search for absolute truth. In addition, participants who had a concept of science as debate were more motivated by higher (rather than lower) uncertainty in climate change messages. The results suggest that achieving alignment between the general public's beliefs about science and the style of the scientific messages is crucial for successful risk communication in science. Accordingly, rather than uncertainty always undermining the effectiveness of science communication, uncertainty can enhance message effects when it fits the audience's understanding of what science is.

KW - Climate science communication

KW - Model of science

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862624283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22324775

AN - SCOPUS:84862624283

VL - 32

SP - 992

EP - 1002

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 214451795