Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser: om evaluering og devaluering i supervision
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser : om evaluering og devaluering i supervision. / Nielsen, Jan.
I: Matrix, Bind 28, Nr. 4, 2011, s. 273-294.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser
T2 - om evaluering og devaluering i supervision
AU - Nielsen, Jan
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Abstract Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation. First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the ‘stress-test’ of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation. The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees.
AB - Abstract Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation. First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the ‘stress-test’ of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation. The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees.
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 28
SP - 273
EP - 294
JO - Matrix
JF - Matrix
SN - 0109-646X
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 35909463